425 résultats trouvés

par RogerGreenwood
mar. 6 oct. 2026 08:05
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Oportunity Charges and Maximum move distance.
Réponses : 3
Vues : 306

Re: Oportunity Charges and Maximum move distance.

In your diagram, unit B3 has to move into opportunity charge range to be charged. In effect it is reacting to the cavalry. It is unusual in our games for infantry to invite cavalry charges in this way, except perhaps by unsupported light cavalry. It could simply form square and await the cavalry, or...
par RogerGreenwood
lun. 5 oct. 2026 08:04
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Oportunity Charges and Maximum move distance.
Réponses : 3
Vues : 306

Re: Oportunity Charges and Maximum move distance.

The opportunity charge happens in the opposing commands phase. It is not counted as part of that unit's movement in its own activation.
Remember that a game turn is about an hour of real time. A unit without an action marker may have moved, but is still ready for combat.
par RogerGreenwood
ven. 28 août 2026 09:01
Forum : Questions
Sujet : Russie 1812-1814 : comment reproduire Borodino avec les malus de tir ?
Réponses : 3
Vues : 754

Re: Russie 1812-1814 : comment reproduire Borodino avec les malus de tir ?

Skirmisher 0 rating and poor shooting ability put -2 on the shooting factor. This brings the effect of a volley down by an attrition, half a loss, not a great deal. On the plus side, the Russians get the stoic ability. This makes them more likely to stand up to the shooting. Given that there are pro...
par RogerGreenwood
jeu. 13 août 2026 20:30
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Order specification
Réponses : 2
Vues : 781

Re: Order specification

There is no specification of targets for these orders. The requirements of the order are sufficient. Occasionally the attack or engage order is fulfilled by advancing towards an objective. Usually the requirement to make a charge or fire a volley makes the enemy the'target'. It is an excellent system.
par RogerGreenwood
sam. 8 août 2026 10:48
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Commanders
Réponses : 3
Vues : 738

Re: Commanders

I would suggest that any game with 300 or fewer points would have only the C. in C rolling for C.P. Division commanders roll for their CP on activation. If there are too many points available for distribution by the C in C the mechanics of the order system will not work correctly. CP should be in sh...
par RogerGreenwood
sam. 25 juil. 2026 09:30
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Oportunity Charge and flank attack
Réponses : 3
Vues : 1383

Re: Oportunity Charge and flank attack

There is an error here I believe at 2C. The pursuit move of the HC is treated as a new charge. It is the reactive player's unit that is charging, hence it must still be an opportunity charge. Under 'resolution" of an opportunity charge in the rules, cavalry charged by opportunity from the flank may ...
par RogerGreenwood
ven. 17 juil. 2026 08:26
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Multiple Attacks
Réponses : 10
Vues : 2966

Re: Multiple Attacks

Pretty much correct. To move with a charging unit, a unit must move in the same group as a charging unit, or move to a morale support position. Such a unit may fire in support. What you cannot do, is move a unit that is not in the same group as a charging unit or moving into a morale support positio...
par RogerGreenwood
mar. 14 juil. 2026 22:32
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Multiple Attacks
Réponses : 10
Vues : 2966

Re: Multiple Attacks

The first question about morale support, Fr5 can only get morale support from correctly aligned unis, I.e none. Hence yes, they can only assist Fr5 with fire support. Second question, multiple charges with units of the same division on the same turn is perfectly possible, CP and positioning permitti...
par RogerGreenwood
mar. 14 juil. 2026 05:51
Forum : Questions
Sujet : Marqueur d'action
Réponses : 15
Vues : 1870

Re: Marqueur d'action

No, the only way a loss gets removed is from performing the rally action. This requires a general with the unit, 2CP plus other conditions. See the page about rallying.
par RogerGreenwood
mar. 14 juil. 2026 05:41
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Multiple Attacks
Réponses : 10
Vues : 2966

Re: Multiple Attacks

Whoops, somehow I have forgotten the +2 for column attacks. The British position is a complete disaster.