85 résultats trouvés
- mar. 26 mars 2024 23:59
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : minor army builder fix needed - large Prussian LW Infantry units are only 5 pts
- Réponses : 6
- Vues : 4844
- dim. 24 mars 2024 15:03
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : minor army builder fix needed - large Prussian LW Infantry units are only 5 pts
- Réponses : 6
- Vues : 4844
Re: minor army builder fix needed - large Prussian LW Infantry units are only 5 pts
This is interesting. I always assumed the point cost on the troops table was what was multiplied by the large/small modifier. But you point out the special abilities comes after the size modifier. I not French Provisional line L2 B Sk1 are 8 points in list therefore a small is @ .75 would be 6. But ...
- lun. 27 nov. 2023 18:47
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Impetuous Cavalry
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 4002
Re: Impetuous Cavalry
Hi, that is the way we have played it, although it contradicts page 19, Impetuous cavalry is always compelled to pursue after a victorious shock. I would say a victorious shock is anything other than a melee result. To quote another. The Rule writing structure is broad principle first, with excepti...
- lun. 27 nov. 2023 18:41
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Flank Opportunity charge question
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 1154
Re: Flank Opportunity charge question
So I see the resolution is a mis-translation and the 4 UD is the triggering range and once it is triggered it is a normal charge.
c'est bon
c'est bon
- jeu. 23 nov. 2023 22:26
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Flank Opportunity charge question
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 1154
Re: Flank Opportunity charge question
If you flee, you are disordered, lose a cohesion, take an action marker and cannot move to within tactical of anyone.
You basically wish you could flee further
You basically wish you could flee further
- jeu. 23 nov. 2023 22:20
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Corps Reserve Artillery movement
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 732
- lun. 20 nov. 2023 00:46
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Opportunity charge on moving non-group
- Réponses : 3
- Vues : 710
Re: Opportunity charge on moving non-group
Agree they are separate moves. This would be exceedingly hard to coordinate which the intention of not group move. So yes the infantry getting too close to enemy mounted would trigger the Opportunity charge before the cavalry also moved.
- lun. 20 nov. 2023 00:42
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Corps Reserve Artillery movement
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 732
Re: Corps Reserve Artillery movement
The CP for the reserve artillery comes from the corps commander directly. I do not believe the unit follows any division orders. It is designed to be the corps artillery operating under the corps commander. If the intent was for it to operate with a division for the battle it would have been assigne...
- dim. 12 nov. 2023 20:51
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : firefight morale test
- Réponses : 9
- Vues : 8021
Re: firefight morale test
My view as well.RogerGreenwood a écrit : ↑sam. 16 sept. 2023 20:12That's a good one. I suspect the reasoning in the rules should be applied. I.e. if the opponents are no longer there, there is no need for a test. Just my opinion though.
- dim. 12 nov. 2023 20:48
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : V2 issues so far
- Réponses : 9
- Vues : 7309
Re: V2 issues so far
Lastly V1 correctly uses the term VOLLEY to refer to mass, simultaneous small arms fire, as opposed to skirmisher fire. So why change to the erroneous SALVO in V2. There is a long discussion document on the Internet that concludes that VOLLEY fire refers to mass, simultaneous small arms fire and SA...