128 résultats trouvés
- jeu. 11 mars 2021 02:17
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Charge Priority
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 6034
Re: Charge Priority
I agree it says that Roger, but what about my other questions?
- mer. 10 mars 2021 22:50
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Charge Priority
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 6034
Charge Priority
Re-reading the rules again (always dangerous) when I noticed something I had missed before under Chare: Target Priority (p. 42). The third bullet reads: "A unit that has one enemy within 2 UD of its flank or rear may make a reorientation to face the threat. It cannot charge another enemy." Not sure ...
- jeu. 4 mars 2021 18:08
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Skirmishers Again
- Réponses : 2
- Vues : 2993
Re: Skirmishers Again
Ahhh, missed that one.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- jeu. 4 mars 2021 15:28
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Skirmishers Again
- Réponses : 2
- Vues : 2993
Skirmishers Again
I was going through the rules again the other day (always a dangerous activity) when I noticed on p. 22 in the discussion of "Skirmisher Factor" the indication that SK0 represented poor quality skirmishers. Now the text makes clear that this only applies to units that include organic (intrinsic?) sk...
- mer. 3 mars 2021 20:18
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Formation Change Clarification
- Réponses : 3
- Vues : 3689
Re: Formation Change Clarification
Ah, thanks Zeitoun. I thought I was missing something.
- mer. 3 mars 2021 12:27
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Formation Change Clarification
- Réponses : 3
- Vues : 3689
Formation Change Clarification
I think I have this right but desire confirmation. A unit making a formation change at the beginning of a charge move must be beyond tactical distance (i.e. 4 UD) of the enemy to do so. A unit making a formation change in any other circumstance can do so freely (apart from the CP expenditure) as lon...
- lun. 1 mars 2021 19:48
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Do Battalion guns suffer any shooting penalty
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 5903
Re: Do Battalion guns suffer any shooting penalty
OK, so in this instance rules consistency wins out over (perhaps) common sense considerations such as those cited for light infantry deployed as detached skirmishers not losing their battalion guns when they meet the clearly stated conditions for a unit losing it's battalion guns. All perfectly clea...
- lun. 1 mars 2021 19:42
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Reserves (Again)
- Réponses : 6
- Vues : 5320
Re: Reserves (Again)
I understand you perfectly I think. I won't even argue that what you've written doesn't make a certain amount of sense. My problem is that everything you've written appears to have been made up out of whole cloth and appears nowhere in the English RAW.
- lun. 1 mars 2021 00:38
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Battalion Guns and Skirmishing
- Réponses : 19
- Vues : 14083
Re: Battalion Guns and Skirmishing
Not trying to be difficult (I just come by it naturally) :oops: and I suspect you are correct. I really do not wish to criticize Herve in any way as I LOVE THESE RULES. I've never written any rules myself, but as I understand things this is like the 4th edition, so I also would expect the rules woul...
- lun. 1 mars 2021 00:32
- Forum : Rules questions
- Sujet : Reserves (Again)
- Réponses : 6
- Vues : 5320
Re: Reserves (Again)
Zeitoun, your English is very clear and understandable. I understand what you are saying, but I'm afraid it just is not what the English RAW say on the subject. I quoted what the English rules say on the subject, and I still do not see how any unit(s) can make operational moves on multiple turns.