128 résultats trouvés

par viperofmilan
jeu. 11 mars 2021 02:17
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Charge Priority
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6034

Re: Charge Priority

I agree it says that Roger, but what about my other questions?
par viperofmilan
mer. 10 mars 2021 22:50
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Charge Priority
Réponses : 7
Vues : 6034

Charge Priority

Re-reading the rules again (always dangerous) when I noticed something I had missed before under Chare: Target Priority (p. 42). The third bullet reads: "A unit that has one enemy within 2 UD of its flank or rear may make a reorientation to face the threat. It cannot charge another enemy." Not sure ...
par viperofmilan
jeu. 4 mars 2021 18:08
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Skirmishers Again
Réponses : 2
Vues : 2993

Re: Skirmishers Again

Ahhh, missed that one.

Thanks.
par viperofmilan
jeu. 4 mars 2021 15:28
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Skirmishers Again
Réponses : 2
Vues : 2993

Skirmishers Again

I was going through the rules again the other day (always a dangerous activity) when I noticed on p. 22 in the discussion of "Skirmisher Factor" the indication that SK0 represented poor quality skirmishers. Now the text makes clear that this only applies to units that include organic (intrinsic?) sk...
par viperofmilan
mer. 3 mars 2021 20:18
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Formation Change Clarification
Réponses : 3
Vues : 3689

Re: Formation Change Clarification

Ah, thanks Zeitoun. I thought I was missing something.
par viperofmilan
mer. 3 mars 2021 12:27
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Formation Change Clarification
Réponses : 3
Vues : 3689

Formation Change Clarification

I think I have this right but desire confirmation. A unit making a formation change at the beginning of a charge move must be beyond tactical distance (i.e. 4 UD) of the enemy to do so. A unit making a formation change in any other circumstance can do so freely (apart from the CP expenditure) as lon...
par viperofmilan
lun. 1 mars 2021 19:48
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Do Battalion guns suffer any shooting penalty
Réponses : 7
Vues : 5903

Re: Do Battalion guns suffer any shooting penalty

OK, so in this instance rules consistency wins out over (perhaps) common sense considerations such as those cited for light infantry deployed as detached skirmishers not losing their battalion guns when they meet the clearly stated conditions for a unit losing it's battalion guns. All perfectly clea...
par viperofmilan
lun. 1 mars 2021 19:42
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Reserves (Again)
Réponses : 6
Vues : 5320

Re: Reserves (Again)

I understand you perfectly I think. I won't even argue that what you've written doesn't make a certain amount of sense. My problem is that everything you've written appears to have been made up out of whole cloth and appears nowhere in the English RAW.
par viperofmilan
lun. 1 mars 2021 00:38
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Battalion Guns and Skirmishing
Réponses : 19
Vues : 14083

Re: Battalion Guns and Skirmishing

Not trying to be difficult (I just come by it naturally) :oops: and I suspect you are correct. I really do not wish to criticize Herve in any way as I LOVE THESE RULES. I've never written any rules myself, but as I understand things this is like the 4th edition, so I also would expect the rules woul...
par viperofmilan
lun. 1 mars 2021 00:32
Forum : Rules questions
Sujet : Reserves (Again)
Réponses : 6
Vues : 5320

Re: Reserves (Again)

Zeitoun, your English is very clear and understandable. I understand what you are saying, but I'm afraid it just is not what the English RAW say on the subject. I quoted what the English rules say on the subject, and I still do not see how any unit(s) can make operational moves on multiple turns.